The firestorm over adult game censorship involving MasterCard and Visa continues to escalate

A growing conflict between game developers, players, and powerful financial institutions is reaching a boiling point. At the heart of it: adult video games. Platforms like Steam have become battlegrounds where creative freedom clashes with corporate control, as payment processors take a hard stance on what content they’re willing to support.

It all began with a letter from an Australian advocacy group.
In July, Collective Shout—an organization known for campaigning against sexualized media—sent a strongly worded letter to major payment companies like MasterCard, Visa, and PayPal. Their message: stop facilitating sales of adult games that include themes like rape and incest. The letter made waves—and it didn’t take long for action to follow.

Steam began quietly removing adult titles.
Without any public announcement, Steam started delisting hundreds of adult games from its store. For many developers, this sudden purge meant losing access to their livelihood with no warning. Entire catalogs vanished overnight, leaving creators scrambling for answers.

Other platforms followed suit, sparking deeper concerns.
Even Itch.io, a platform known for its indie-friendly and progressive stance, responded by removing over 20,000 adult games from its search index. They called it a “time-critical moment” to secure their payment systems—a move many interpreted as desperation. But the sweep didn’t just hit the extreme content. Queer romance stories, narrative-driven erotic games, and even mild adult material were caught in the fallout. That’s when alarm bells really began ringing.

The internet didn’t stay quiet.
Predictably, backlash spread like wildfire. A Change.org petition demanding payment processors step back quickly soared past 200,000 signatures. Social media erupted with criticism of what many saw as blatant censorship and corporate overreach. Even Elon Musk chimed in, praising the pushback efforts.

Visa and MasterCard issued statements—but the story got murky.
In response to the backlash, both companies released carefully worded statements insisting they were simply following existing laws and policies on “high-risk” content. However, Valve, the company behind Steam, shared a conflicting narrative with PC Gamer. They claimed the payment processors directly contacted them with concerns about “brand risk,” and that even after Valve explained their platform only hosted legal games, the dialogue was cut short. The result? A standoff with mixed messages on both sides.

The situation echoes the OnlyFans scandal from 2021.
When OnlyFans attempted to ban adult content due to pressure from financial institutions, creators revolted—and the company reversed its decision within days. Now, many in the gaming community see a similar pattern unfolding, with developers—particularly those creating LGBTQ+ content—feeling singled out by financial gatekeepers.

But this time, gamers are taking real action.
Beyond online outrage, the community got organized. Mass call-ins to Visa and MasterCard customer service lines were reported, with mixed results—some were hung up on, others received canned responses. Meanwhile, GOG stepped in with a bold statement: their “FreedomToBuy” campaign offered 13 delisted adult games for free. The catch? Once downloaded, they’re yours forever—no DRM, no take-backs.

The response was overwhelming.
More than one million users claimed the free games on launch day alone, prompting GOG to issue an update: their servers were being pushed to the limit by the surge in traffic. The message was loud and clear—gamers weren’t backing down from what they saw as censorship by proxy.

There are some signs of recovery—but the broader issue remains.
Itch.io has begun restoring some free NSFW games, since free titles avoid payment processor restrictions. Steam, meanwhile, is offering affected developers store credits toward future compliant releases. But many believe the solution may need to come from lawmakers. One proposed bill, introduced by Senator Kevin Cramer, would bar banks and card companies from discriminating against legal businesses—a potential safeguard for adult game creators.

The standoff is far from over.
Collective Shout remains firm in its campaign, insisting companies are entitled to choose what they support based on ethical values. Gamers, however, argue that personal choice—not corporate ethics—should determine what content is available. With age verification laws tightening in the UK and similar debates emerging elsewhere, this conversation around adult content in gaming is likely to drag on.

What’s clear is that this community isn’t backing down.
Gamers and developers alike have shown they’re willing to mobilize when they believe their freedoms are being threatened. Whether that pressure results in meaningful change—or simply another round of corporate damage control—remains to be seen.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe & share!